--Wow, I had to reread what I wrote but I cannot fathom how it was misconstrued to include recommended that "...we harass the process of bringing in a greater supply of electricity...." and effectively costing taxpayers more money! Really, this is I what I asked, "..I hope many will take a look and intervene as needed to try to protect the birds we still have. "While I don't know what to think about that I do disagree with Mr. Reeser's statement, "Birds are more adaptable than some people give them credit for." I'm not sure how many Colorado birders are aware of the very real of extinction of Lesser Prairie Chickens from southeast Colorado which has been identified as in part due to gas and oil activity: "The lesser prairie-chicken population, which once numbered in the hundreds of thousands, has dwindled across its historical range by an estimated 90%, "due largely to habitat loss and fragmentation," USFWS said, with oil and gas activity contributing to the decline".Some of the issues with gas and oil activity that have caused the decline of these Lesser Prairie Chickens are similar to what expansion of electric utility lines would bring. I don't consider the risk of expiration of this species to be a "small price to pay."I certainly hope that more level headed consideration be given to this issue. I am a strong supporter of accountability and that I believe that utilizing companies need to be held accountable for their actions that might cause serious damage to vital bird habitat. And that will only happen when those of us who are serious about bird conservation intervene (fyi, before I get misconstrued again that does not imply that this project has to be stopped or that the company should be harassed.)Just an addition piece of info, other interests such as the cultural advocates are intervening to avoid this project being harmful to their interests in Eastern Colorado.SeEtta MossCanon CityOn Thu, Dec 9, 2021, 9:09 AM Rick Reeser <rcreeser@gmail.com> wrote:Cobirders: In response to the post about Xcel expanding their power network, I have several responses:
1. You can't have your cake and eat it, too. You can't be a consumer of significantly more electricity (in contrast to using fossil fuels for cars, furnace, etc.) without supporting the electrical supply chain. The electrical supply chain comes with some sacrifices, just like oil drilling comes with some negatives.
2. If we harass the process of bringing in a greater supply of electricity, it comes with adding a significant cost to the end product. Remember, Xcel has to pass onto us the economic costs of this $2 billion project. Do we want it more than that?
3. Birds are far more adaptable than some people give them credit for. It's like when I fill my feeders. The birds leave for a short time, but they will be back where food can be found. Yes, construction is a short-term annoyance, but the long-term benefit makes it worth it. And, the actual loss of habitat is likely to be quite small.
4. The addition of more power lines in remote areas that are not known for their tourism potential seems like a small sacrifice to pay for getting the electricity we need. California has had numerous fires and power outages due to demanding too high of electrical consumption before having the infrastructure to support it. Some of their fires were started by aging electrical systems and their power outages- that were almost daily when I was there this past year- were quite disruptive. We need the electrical infrastructure to move forward to prevent these types of things from happening.
5. Will these power stations and lines actually kill lots of birds or make them move permanently far away. I doubt it. Our cars kill lots of birds, but we don't propose eliminating cars because of that- we drive with greater caution instead.
We need to work with Xcel on this project to minimize the harm to the habitat, not work against them. Offering to work with someone is far more effective than working against them.
Rick Reeser
Milliken
--On Wednesday, December 8, 2021 at 11:00:55 AM UTC-7 SeEtta wrote:I just found mapping by Excel of their 'Colorado Power Pathway' of new substations and giant transmission lines that are proposed to cut through eastern Colorado including in or near some very important bird habitat including Chico Basin. Are any conservation groups or birding groups that concern themselves with protecting vital bird habitat monitoring this? As the conservation chair for Arkansas Valley Audubon Society I am now going to try to send comments on their incursions into areas that we service buy there is a lot of Eastern Colorado that will is north of our area that will be impacted by that this major expansion by Excel. Given all the negative impacts on the birds we all love to watch I hope many will take a look and intervene as needed to try to protect the birds we still have. Here is the maps and basic info I have found: https://www.coloradospowerpathway.com/project-description/SeEtta MossCanon City
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Colorado Birds" group.
To post to this group, send email to cobirds@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cobirds?hl=en?hl=en
* All posts should be signed with the poster's full name and city. Include bird species and location in the subject line when appropriate
* Join Colorado Field Ornithologists https://cobirds.org/CFO/Membership/
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Colorado Birds" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cobirds+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cobirds/f5ca2054-ead5-4d22-8e0c-ed6b9aeb0ddbn%40googlegroups.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Colorado Birds" group.
To post to this group, send email to cobirds@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cobirds?hl=en?hl=en
* All posts should be signed with the poster's full name and city. Include bird species and location in the subject line when appropriate
* Join Colorado Field Ornithologists https://cobirds.org/CFO/Membership/
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Colorado Birds" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cobirds+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cobirds/CAAUvckpRdOQqTvfJ3v9b%2B0k58x6rqhqcxcZkELccFWPD%3DM13XA%40mail.gmail.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Colorado Birds" group.
To post to this group, send email to cobirds@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cobirds?hl=en?hl=en
* All posts should be signed with the poster's full name and city. Include bird species and location in the subject line when appropriate
* Join Colorado Field Ornithologists https://cobirds.org/CFO/Membership/
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Colorado Birds" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cobirds+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cobirds/CACPnx8Ug5VA9H9YSNez39RygqFwoBm0NWwMMCzLhKAgCTiMxtQ%40mail.gmail.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment